In satire, some situation or person is held up for ridicule, usually with the intent to promote some change or reform in society.
In order for satire to be effective, the audience must feel that the criticism is deserved.
The object of criticism should not be a victim of circumstance or individuals, but must in some sense be responsible for its flaws. Otherwise, the criticism may engender sympathy for the target of criticism and animosity toward the critic.
The critic must maintain high ethos: the critic speaks from a position of moral/intellectual superiority. The satire will be ineffective if
The tone of the criticism may be harsh and angry (emphasizing "moral indignation," sometimes labeled "tragic satire") or laughing (emphasizing intellectual (and sometimes social) superiority, sometimes labeled "comic satire").
Satire frequently employs various figures of speech and uses of irony (where what is said is not what is meant), including hyperbole (exaggeration) and understatement (presenting as less important than warranted).
Possible organizations of an essay using satire
:In this type of satire, a social role or attitude/behavior toward a social role is held up to ridicule.
In this type of satire, a ridiculous solution or alternative is offered for some social problem. To be effective the ridiculous solution should
Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal," which suggests the poor raise their children to sell as food, illustrates this approach. For instance, an essay titled "'Till Death Do Us Part': The Christian Alternative to Divorce--Murder" might ridicule the ambivalent attitudes toward divorce in some conservative fundamentalist circles where divorce seems to be a greater "sin" than murder, theft, rape, or other crimes.
ENGL1010 Composition I